tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post3165395345242927357..comments2011-07-14T22:59:10.436-07:00zelcershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09318630814763153352noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-7414834453843346282011-07-14T22:59:10.436-07:002011-07-14T22:59:10.436-07:00

I always thought Elster was 21. Bobby V. should be #2.

johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-74409919977086076432010-12-20T18:24:58.208-08:002010-12-20T18:24:58.208-08:00

56 tug mc graw 69 world series do your home work if you give 45 to franco

Arthurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07733214209029778166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-90899169614122904712010-05-24T04:51:22.626-07:002010-05-24T04:51:22.626-07:00

METS ROCKKKKKKKK SOOOOOOO ALL U HATERS CAN LEAVE NOW

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-79957722509441481932010-03-30T19:37:40.851-07:002010-03-30T19:37:40.851-07:00

How about George Stone for number 40? He was 12-2 in 1973, and was only a Met for a couple years, but without him in 1973, who knows? Definitely Cleon Jones for number 21. I get Reyes for 7, but Kranepool was a career Mets player.

Tomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-40327117913482088002010-03-26T06:31:52.619-07:002010-03-26T06:31:52.619-07:00

Shimi and Jon - In hind sight I stand corrected as i should have put Wayne Garrett at number 11. <br />Jon - thank you for your comment. As for the 12,34,21 and 51 i took advantage (cheated) to get more guys on the list. For example I would rather have Lance Johnson and Mookie Wilson than Mookie Wilson and Rick White. I suppose 47 could go to Jessie Orosco. 29 was a judgment call but i always

METSFANFOREVERhttp://www.metsfanforever.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-19580414466763689772010-03-25T19:12:49.196-07:002010-03-25T19:12:49.196-07:00

Nice work! My thought is that some of these guys didn&#39;t occupy their numbers long enough to own them; or they did more in another number. <br /><br />11 oughta be Garrett (longer Met career, decent power/OBP for the times and a surprise rookie success in 69)<br /><br />12 Mazzilli was 12 only for a few weeks; I&#39;d go with Boswell or even Willie Randolph<br /><br />21 -- Could put Jones

Jonhttp://mbtn.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5233571669369268298.post-5184485842981517662010-03-24T10:30:26.038-07:002010-03-24T10:30:26.038-07:00

How in hell does Tim Teufel show up not only once, but TWICE, on your Mets &quot;all-time&quot; team lists? <br /><br />TIM TEUFEL? Are you kidding me? Did he even play full time when he was with the Mets? <br /><br />In his 5+ years with the Mets, he hit a grand total of 35 HRs, had a .256 BA, stole 6 bases, and never played in more than 97 games in any season. Sure, that was in his only &quot;

Shimihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18064967069675116555noreply@blogger.com